Lyman Debacle: NATO is Really Bad at Maneuver Warfare

NATO has a problem; it’s a “defensive military alliance” designed for conventional warfare, but the one thing they’re consistently really, really bad at is… conventional warfare. Ukrainian soldiers supported by NATO HIMARS, intelligence, battle planning, and leadership, set out to encircle a much smaller force of Russians, waded through artillery fire for days, then failed to close the fourth side, allowing everyone inside the cauldron to quietly escape. Let’s take a look at what happened.

NATO Expert Reveals Nuclear Final Solution to the Russian Problem

Retired Col. Hamish de Bretton-Gordon from the British Army just gave an astonishing interview with CNN in which he explained how “tactical” nuclear weapons could be used to defeat (destroy) Russia. In short, he claims that Russia would be the one to use tactical nukes: “tactical nuclear weapons could still create huge amounts of damage, … Read more

Russia’s Mobilization and “Defense in Depth”

Today I decided to take another look at the fourth phase of Russia’s special military operation, which began with the announcement of a referendum in four liberated oblasts of Ukraine, as well as the announcement of a partial mobilization of Russian citizens. As I noted in a previous post, there is a huge amount of propaganda and disinformation coming from pro-NATO outlets, but it’s easy to refute. That said, I think almost everyone is missing the significance of these events, and these misinterpretations could spell global disaster.