My chief problem with “liberal progressivism” is that all of their causes, every single one of them, is just veiled anti-natalism. Which is fine, but they’re not honest about their true intentions, and when someone is not honest, that is reason to believe he is malicious. For proof, one need not look further than progressives’ own rhetoric, and how they react with vile hostility when someone chooses to not participate in their anti-natalist lifestyle.
Here’s another clear warning flag. You’re only allowed to speak positively of progressive movements and ideology. For example, Chuck Schumer openly said the USA needs more immigrants because birth rates are too low. But if someone were to make that exact statement, word for word, but in a negative context, he would be condemned as a conspiracy theorist, racist, anti-semitic, blah blah blah.
Consider the issues that have become flagship talking points for the progressive cult, and how they all serve as vehicles for anti-natalism.
Abortion – fine, almost every developed country has codified abortion. Abortion and infanticide were always a necessary evil (consider, for example, impoverished English mothers dropping their starving infants into the Thames) – but it isn’t a lifestyle and shouldn’t be celebrated as such. Also consider how incredibly toxic the feminist abortion narrative is, describing the fetus as a parasite, a burden, a disease, etc. A healthy, balanced nation has very few abortions. A nation suffering economic and social distress has many abortions. Simple, and the opposite of what progressives preach. Normal countries encourage people to have children and keep them, as opposed to considering pregnancy as vulgar and obscene, something that should be done away with. Look at the irrational hostility progressives display when they see a family with many children, particularly a white family.
Sex and Gender: of course everyone should have equal rights and most normal people would agree with that statement, but remember, again, this isn’t an honest movement, it’s just a veiled way to push anti-natalism. Some American schools report that almost half of their students are LGBT or non-binary (mostly girls, which is interesting in of itself) – that’s an actual demographic apocalypse, but it’s ignored.
The anti-natalist agenda of western progressives has become so obvious that other countries, particularly countries that are concerned about birthrates – Poland, Georgia, Russia, China, being just a few examples, have begun to push back against what they call LGBT propaganda, and all citing natalism as the chief reason for pushing back. The emperor has no clothes, which is apparently obvious to lawmakers in Russia and China – if too many young people become homosexual or gender-nonconforming, birth rates collapse – on the western side of the iron curtain, however, such thought crimes are forbidden. You can’t even suggest that a collapsing birth rate is bad, or should be discouraged.
And finally, consider the war in Ukraine, which – even if it stays non-nuclear – benefits no one and has the escalating risk of consuming and destroying huge swathes of the European population. Ukraine has, so far, lost several generations of men and will take decades to recover (assuming they recover at all), and Russia has lost more people than they did in Chechnya. Imagine if Poland, Moldova, Romania, Finland, Georgia, and Belarus also one-by-one get sucked into the war as direct participants. Even with conventional weapons alone, that would cause additional hundreds of thousands if not millions of deaths. And for what reason? So NATO can have bases in Russia’s soft underbelly? No, it’s crazy, and the only group that benefits is the stateless nation that seems to pull all the strings in western progressive/globalist politics.
Ian Kummer
Support my work by making a contribution through Boosty
All text in Reading Junkie posts are free to share or republish without permission, and I highly encourage my fellow bloggers to do so. Please be courteous and link back to the original.
I now have a new YouTube channel that I will use to upload videos from my travels around Russia. Expect new content there soon. Please give me a follow here.
Also feel free to connect with me on Quora (I sometimes share unique articles there).
I think you r right, but what’s the point? Why do they push that? I actually see problem in both this agenda and in reaction to it. Reaction is totally normal in this case, no LGBTQ pride in my yard please, but it is always what any reaction is: excessive and aggressive. I accept it as necessary evil, but not rejoice over it. So, again, why do they need it? To kill [white] people? Why?
To control. Weaken the host (white nations) with debt enslavement, economic impoverishment and (now) non-white migration to better control it.
And it’s not even a plan, they’ve been doing this for millennia (and being expelled when finally the natives open their eyes) because it’s in their genetic code, they move by instinct. This is what most don’t understand: they’re a tribe, and act in unison even if separated by oceans.
There’s another thing about them, even if they have high IQs they’re not very bright, they always go too far. Like now for example: they’re in the process of destroying Western Civilization which means killing the host, and in the process killing themselves too; but they just can’t help it.
Maybe some of them realize and hope to replace the West with Russia or China; they’re wrong. China is Jew-aware and Russia is Jew-immune.
Why did God put them on earth? The chosen people? I’d more readily believe a tribe of Africa pigmies were the ones.
Excellent point Montmorency. It’s revenge and genocide. Beginning with the Norse, the white Holy Roman Empire wreaked havoc worldwide murdering, pillaging and enslaving wherever they went.
agree on some points, not so much on others. maybe some “feminists” on the valerie solanas end of the spectrum see kids as “parasites” (which they technically are) but i know many who have kids and treasure them. their main objection is coerced or forced carrying of a kid they don’t want. plus – it needs to be said – once there’s 8 billion of something it ceases to be terribly important or special. just my take as an open anti-humanist.
as for the guys in dresses, i’ll go with the left/feminist critics and point out that any time a guy wants to take away a woman’s privacy, safety and rights he’s hardly “progressive”. if anything these transvestitic fetishists express a toxic individuality that would make ayn rand proud. as with most of the ostensible “progressive”/”left” types it’s simply will to power expressed through proxies in the disguise of egalitarian “virtue”. the term “cry bully” sums it up well. they’re still bigots who crave dominance over others and cheer on “choices” that amount to nothing but narcissistic urges.
Good one too, The Pair.
They are only leftist in that they call themselves leftists, but we all know they get their funding from the ruling class.
Even Lenin said these people suffer from an infantile disorder.
Since my country the USA has been taken over by Neocon Nazis, Neolib Nazis and the Zio-Nazis who are in control, the hatred of Russia and China is scary as hell. The Zio-Nazis control Hollywood, the media, academia and our government. That’s a lot of power held by less than 2% of our population. Damn if they ain’t the “Chosen People”!
Look in the face of Jesus Christ in all Western Churches. Does He look like a brown Middle Eastern Jew? No! That fake “Jesus” that tool of Satan is responsible for the death and destruction caused in this World.
Remember the Rolling Stones Masterpiece Sympathy for the Devil? “To find what’s confusing you is the nature of my game”. I can sing the hell out of it Karaoke! 😉
I have two problems with gender ideology:
1. It is militant and crusading, as Western ideas typically are. They demand other people conform.
–If Qatar hosts the World Cup, we have a year of challenges to the social rules there, all kinds of manifestations of deviancy, just to pillory the Qatari.
–The most important thing about Afghanistan is if the girls are going to school. If they actually live, have food, are not sold into slavery … we don’t care about that. We only care about merely symbolic abstract stuff, not whether these girls are able to survive!
–Putin is hated most b/c Russia has decided to promote traditional families and old back on lbgt+ propaganda.
2. It is a movement of denial, denial of nature most of all. It is therefore instable. On the one had they want to say that gender is a choice, an expression of free human subjectivity. On the other, they want to justify homosexuality etc by saying that sexual predilections are born, orientation is a physical genetic attribute. This leads to problems with people who are MAPs (Minor Attracted Persons), b/c then you need to posit Adult Attracted Children to round things out.
On the one hand gay marriage is just as valid as marriage; on the other hand, marriage is a banal bourgeois convention — we should avoid marriage and avoid being tied down by commitment, go with the flow, sexual encounters should be spontaneous with whoever is at hand. But here too, it cannot be both. Marriage cannot be a social institution for gays as well as others, and also be outmoded patriarchal instrument of oppression and reification.
Most of all, children have little place at the center of this ideology.
But children are human being in optima forma — people who don’t like children don’t really love humanity.