Dawn Ennis, a failed journalist and confused man who thinks he’s a woman, tweeted a deranged tirade against the “fastest girl in Connecticut,” Chelsea Mitchell. Is it socially acceptable for a grown man to speak about a teenage girl this way? Normally, no. But if the man puts on a wig and pretends he’s a woman, he can do whatever he wants. As usual, this tactic of men dogpiling young girls worked. The USA Today editorial team folded and changed her article to remove “hurtful” words like “male” in order to be more inclusive to men who think they’re women.
#ChelseaMitchell wrote an op-ed in @USATODAY that is going to resonate with a lot of athletes and moms and dads. But it’s full of lies and omissions. https://t.co/eEFAX42ln0
— Dawn Ennis (She/Her/Hers) (@lifeafterdawn) May 22, 2021
Last month, Ms. Mitchell penned an op-ed for USA Today about the plight faced by her and other high school female athletes. They’re routinely crushed by much larger and stronger biological males, ruining any chances those girls have at awards and scholarships. In recent races Chelsea has defeated biological men, and more than once. A girl beating a man on the track is impressive, and congratulations to her. But such occurrences are rare. Men pretending to be women routinely take away girls’ athletic opportunities. It’s a disgrace further compounded by Joe Biden’s administration, which has withdrawn the girls’ supreme court case against biological men.
.@USATODAY published our client Chelsea Mitchell’s opinion about the unfairness she experienced being forced to compete against male athletes. But after backlash from the woke mob, editors unilaterally changed Chelsea’s words & called them “hurtful language.” 1/3 pic.twitter.com/tAtzrZgPzt
— Christiana Holcomb (@ChristianaADF) May 26, 2021
As outrageous as these men are, they can perpetrate their delusions at women’s expense, and with total impunity. Consider this story from last year about an Oregon resident who was arrested for a “hate crime.” What was his offense? He beat a man for going into the women’s restroom. In a sane world he would be described as “hero” but in ours he’s “criminal.” Why? Because the creep identified as a woman, so was legally permitted to use the same restroom as small girls. Because of course he was.
Oh, and let’s not forget Rachel Levine, Joe Biden’s health secretary. Because a mentally ill man is the perfect authority on health, am I right?
Ian Kummer
Support my work by making a contribution through Boosty
All text in Reading Junkie posts are free to share or republish without permission, and I highly encourage my fellow bloggers to do so. Please be courteous and link back to the original.
I now have a new YouTube channel that I will use to upload videos from my travels around Russia. Expect new content there soon. Please give me a follow here.
Also feel free to connect with me on Quora (I sometimes share unique articles there).
While I didn’t see any bullying by this deranged (perhaps you could point to the part that was so offensive? I mean disagreeing with a woman, young or not is not offensive in itself) man, I fully agree that ‘transgender’ isn’t a thing that exists outside this guys nutty noggin. But here’s the thing you overlook: transgender wouldn’t be a ‘thing’ if it wasn’t for the support of the majority of young women 15 to 30. These young women don’t tend to ‘value’ female sports very much, and for whatever reason they’ve adopted trans (both trans women (men) and trans men (females) and the nonbinary in general. Thus they’ve made it ‘cool’, and young men don’t tend to care and tend to go along with whatever the younger women want, which means at least pretending to support ‘trans rights’. “Trans” has also succeeded in largely but not entirely taking over the current feminist movement and its institutional positions (once again, not entirely but mostly) and thus most TERFS(Trans Exclusionary Radical Feminist) no matter their feminist ‘pedigree’ are pretty marginalized in most feminist spaces and places now. In short, this isn’t really a problem that men alone are going to be able to ‘fix’, at least until we find out why so many of the most influential and youngest and prettiest women have decided that supporting ‘trans’ and ‘nonbinary’ is so important to them, since its young women who, by and large control most popular culture and popular culture is right downstream from popular politics.
Hi Clarence!
He came off as very aggressive to me, characterizing her as a “bigot,” an “extremist,” etc. – however I concede you might see that as hyperbole on my part. That said, I completely agree with you. Let’s bear in mind this is hardly the first ideology that has passed with the approval of high-status women. In fact, every ideology needs the approval of those women to survive and I challenge anyone to show me an ideology that reached any significance without that approval.
I think there is a compelling argument with a lot of evidence that women tend to be the “gatekeepers” of ideology and cultural norms. They’re the ones who tend to adapt religious traditions most fervently and are the primary caregivers for children. This trend has held true for religions like Christianity and Islam, and political systems like communism. Hell, any system of beliefs. I suspect that what happened with transgenderism is no different. It became a “cool” cult to believe in, and women started using transgenderism as a way to virtue signal to their peers – and as you already laid out, the rest is history.
While I didn't see any bullying by this deranged (perhaps you could point to the part that was so offensive? I mean disagreeing with a woman, young or not is not offensive in itself) man, I fully agree that 'transgender' isn't a thing that exists outside this guys nutty noggin. But here's the thing you overlook: transgender wouldn't be a 'thing' if it wasn't for the support of the majority of young women 15 to 30. These young women don't tend to 'value' female sports very much, and for whatever reason they've adopted trans (both trans women (men) and trans men (females) and the nonbinary in general. Thus they've made it 'cool', and young men don't tend to care and tend to go along with whatever the younger women want, which means at least pretending to support 'trans rights'. "Trans" has also succeeded in largely but not entirely taking over the current feminist movement and its institutional positions (once again, not entirely but mostly) and thus most TERFS(Trans Exclusionary Radical Feminist) no matter their feminist 'pedigree' are pretty marginalized in most feminist spaces and places now. In short, this isn't really a problem that men alone are going to be able to 'fix', at least until we find out why so many of the most influential and youngest and prettiest women have decided that supporting 'trans' and 'nonbinary' is so important to them, since its young women who, by and large control most popular culture and popular culture is right downstream from popular politics.
Hi Clarence!He came off as very aggressive to me, characterizing her as a "bigot," an "extremist," etc. – however I concede you might see that as hyperbole on my part. That said, I completely agree with you. Let's bear in mind this is hardly the first ideology that has passed with the approval of high-status women. In fact, every ideology needs the approval of those women to survive and I challenge anyone to show me an ideology that reached any significance without that approval. I think there is a compelling argument with a lot of evidence that women tend to be the "gatekeepers" of ideology and cultural norms. They're the ones who tend to adapt religious traditions most fervently and are the primary caregivers for children. This trend has held true for religions like Christianity and Islam, and political systems like communism. Hell, any system of beliefs. I suspect that what happened with transgenderism is no different. It became a "cool" cult to believe in, and women started using transgenderism as a way to virtue signal to their peers – and as you already laid out, the rest is history.