Can Israel’s Doomsday Weapon Destroy Human Civilization?

There has been a lot of discussion in the past month about Israel’s “Samson Option,” what it is, how serious of a threat it poses, or if Israeli nuclear weapons even exist. Here’s my best attempt at answering these questions.

First, the most important question – do Israeli nukes exist? Simply, yes they do. Nuclear weapons just aren’t particularly expensive or difficult to develop and maintain. South Africa did it after all. Bottom line, Israel almost certainly has nuclear weapons, possibly as many as 400, and there is no reason to doubt this fact, even in the absence of more concrete information.

Last Sunday, Israel’s heritage minister, Amichai Eliyahu, suggested nuking Gaza, prompting his near-immediate condemnation and suspension. However, considering Israel’s “neither confirm nor deny” policy for nuclear weapons, it is likely that his crime wasn’t suggesting the extermination of Gaza, but an unauthorized acknowledgement that Israeli nukes exist. He’s far from the first to run afoul of these rules. In 1986, former nuclear technician Mordechai Vanunu leaked information to the British press. Unfortunately for Vanunu, the Mossad caught wind of this, so kidnapped and tortured him.

Because of their state policy of deliberate ambiguity, and willingness to use brutal methods to enforce such policy even on their own citizens, Israeli authors typically refer to nuclear weapons with euphemisms, the most popular one being “the Samson Option,” referring to the Biblical judge who used his last dying effort to bring down the pillars of the Philistine temple, killing himself and everybody around him. This choice of euphemism is particularly interesting, and differs from other Biblical phrases that could have been used, such as “eye for an eye,” which would imply proportional and equivalent retaliation against a specific aggressor. Say, hypothetically, a neighboring country overran Israel and destroyed its people, a nuclear strike would be proportional in such a scenario, but that’s not what the Samson Option implies. It implies destroying, well, everyone. But who is “everyone” and is that literally everyone on earth, or just select people?

That’s almost a self-answering question, as even the highest estimates of 400 nukes is quite obviously not enough to destroy all humans, just some of us. So that leaves the question of who then? Famed Israeli military and geopolitical historian Martin van Creveld offered some candid insight in 2003:

We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets for our air force. Let me quote General Moshe Dayan: ‘Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother.’ I consider it all hopeless at this point. We shall have to try to prevent things from coming to that, if at all possible. Our armed forces, however, are not the thirtieth strongest in the world, but rather the second or third. We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that that will happen before Israel goes under.

I do find it curious that Creveld and other authors like him spill much more ink spelling out how they would destroy European civilization, not Arab or Islamic civilization. So, I am inclined to believe the threat or at least the spirit of the threat. Israelis and zionists feel much more hatred, malice even, against European Christian civilization than against their neighbors and Islam, and this shouldn’t be a surprise. Christianity and Judaism cannot ideologically coexist, as the prophesied Messiah has already arrived. According to Christians, “God’s chosen people” are literally everyone who accepts Christ as their savior, which is unacceptable to the zionists’ ideology of ethnic supremacy, that they alone are special to God and everyone else is Gentile vermin. The European-Jew feud is political as well as religious. The Romans crushed the Hebrew rebellion and destroyed the second temple. Every major European power in the last 1,000 years has clashed with Jews to at least some degree.

After World War II, zionists quickly identified and capitalized on white guilt to found and maintain the state of Israel. White guilt is European and European-descended peoples’ well-intentioned but misguided feeling of regret about historical wrongs and desire to make amends for them. That feeling can easily be manipulated in the service of perverse goals. For example, American whites feel guilty about slavery and Jim Crow, so predominantly white activists spearheaded the “defund the police” movement. Letting criminals in poor neighborhoods do whatever they want with no fear of punishment has done wonders for the African American community, as we all know. Europeans “appeased Hitler” or whatever they’re calling it now, and make up for this moral failure by overthrowing bad dictators all over the world. Overthrowing governments and turning them into failed states just does wonders for people in developing countries. The solution to colonialism is more colonialism!

Israel might be the best example of white guilt run amok. The correct lesson from 1945 is “war and genocide are bad.” It’s such a simple lesson and really, there was no need to ever have a major war (and accompanying genocide) about anything ever again. But that’s not the lesson we learned, and it’s because of that “white guilt.” We learned that “wars and genocides against Jews” are bad. With such a perverse lesson in mind, European civilizations somewhat collectively decided “wars and genocides are actually good if they’re done in service of the Jews we failed to protect in the 1940s.” That’s why we did nothing when zionists started to ethnically cleanse Palestinians in 1947, and why we still did nothing when they developed a secret nuclear arsenal with a dangerously vague doctrine for their use, in flagrant disregard of all international norms. Imagine, is there any other state in the world that could get away with developing nuclear weapons and then refusing to give any concrete specifics for what conditions and purposes they’re for? No, of course not. Incidentally, I do have to wonder if the Israelis’ particular hatred for Palestinians stems from an awareness that Palestinians have more in common with ancient Hebrews than colonists who lived in Europe for thousands of years. Unsurprisingly, direct-to-consumer DNA tests are completely prohibited in Israel.

Does the USA count as a European civilization that needs to be destroyed by the Samson Option? Maybe, but I doubt it. It would take a truly massive nuclear strike to permanently eliminate the USA as a world power, and as of right now only Russia is capable of that. The complexity of delivering a nuclear strike over such a great distance, and the likelihood of most or all of the nuclear weapons being intercepted along the way, makes any Israeli attack on the USA not worthwhile.

Furthermore, if the state of Israel is destroyed, the zionists need to think about where to plant their flag next, and the USA is the best candidate. Since the Bush regime and every American president after him, the USA’s foreign policy has been synonymous with Israel’s. It’s worth mentioning that the USA has the highest Jewish population in the world, so it’s as logical a place as any for a new homeland, and also a compelling reason to not destroy it with nukes.

White American evangelical Christians arguably suffer from more self-hating white guilt more than anyone else, and have been Israel’s most fanatical supporters up to the present day. From the Guardian:

Broadly speaking, some evangelicals believe that Jewish people returning to Israel following the 1917 ​​Balfour Declaration, a British statement which called for “the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people”, was key to end times, when God will purge sinners and Jesus Christ will return.

John Hagee, an evangelical pastor and influential founder of Christians United for Israel, explained the prophecy to TBN Networks in December 2022.

“God is getting ready to defend Israel in such a supernatural way it’s going to take the breath out of the lungs of the dictators on planet Earth but we are living on the cusp of the greatest most supernatural series of events the world has ever seen ready or not.”

America’s dominant religious group quite literally believes we have to support Israel because it confirms their perverted understanding of the Biblical end times. What should we think about people who knowingly and deliberately push for geopolitical policy that will bring about the extinction of mankind? Well, I think they’re even more dangerous than Israel, but that’s just me. Even in the complete absence of Israel, zionism, or Judaism, these people would still be suckers for some other group of con artists.

So here’s my lineup of cities that Israel would target with nuclear weapons:

-Rome
-Moscow
-Saint Petersburg
-London
-Paris
-Berlin
-Tehran
Maybe Istanbul (Constantinople)


They would target other capitals and thoroughly destroy European civilization and its cultural heritage as much as possible, dependent on the size of the arsenal and its limitations. As bizarre and ironic as this might sound, I don’t think they would target Islamic cities besides Istanbul (and only because of its Christian and Roman heritage). Whether or not Istanbul got cratered would be dependent on whether or not zionists need a Turkey moving forward. They might not even nuke the country that delivered the killing blow! Arabs need to be on at least tolerable terms with the USA and nuking them would be a bit much. But Persians – Iran – would absolutely be nuked. They don’t play by American or zionist rules, so would need to be destroyed. In the zionist new world order emerging from the atomic dust, there’s no place for Iran or Iranians.

At least, that’s what I think. Take my opinion for what it’s worth. But I would like everyone to ask themselves if we should be allies, or even tolerate the existence of a state with a “Samson Option” of rage quitting and killing us all.

Ian Kummer

Support my work by making a contribution through Boosty

All text in Reading Junkie posts are free to share or republish without permission, and I highly encourage my fellow bloggers to do so. Please be courteous and link back to the original.

I now have a new YouTube channel that I will use to upload videos from my travels around Russia. Expect new content there soon. Please give me a follow here.

Also feel free to connect with me on Quora (I sometimes share unique articles there).



5 thoughts on “Can Israel’s Doomsday Weapon Destroy Human Civilization?”

  1. Israel nuking European targets – I wonder what the Russian strategy for such an event is.
    Yes, Jews hate Christians and they hate Orthodox Ruskies in particular.

    Reply
  2. The two leading fences of discourse after ww2 are:
    1. The Good War
    2. The Holocaust
    The argument about appeasing is unfalsifiable, and a little like simulating an earthquake to test whether the building could stand an earthquake. It precludes any compromise other than absolute supremacy.

    a. I suspect the hatred of Europe has more to do with supremacy: European civilization has always been ascendent until now, all the others are not important enough to be the enemy, and insofar as they are dangerous, dangerous due to the adoption of European technical and social/organizational innovations.

    b. As for the DNA, I suspect Jewish DNA overlaps largely with the host nations where they hail from.

    c. And then the Jewish homeland question. Nazi ideology initially actually suggested the region around Auschwitz as a Jewish homeland. Of course the problem had been solved before it came to the fore in the wake of ww2. It’s called the Jewish Autonomous Oblast https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_Autonomous_Oblast

    Reply
  3. Good onya for bringing up the Samson Option, Ian. I haven’t seen a whole lot of references to it at other sites I read. Perhaps because it’s too horrible to contemplate. And gormless, guilt-ridden people think that discussing how Israel might just kill us all is a no-no. But what makes you so optimistic about how hard Israel might slam the Samson? I’m only being half-ironic here.

    You posit that if the Zionists are about to go under a tide of a million mad Muslims, they’ll incinerate half a dozen European cities, Teheran and maybe Istanbul. But only those? Why wouldn’t they obliterate Mecca and Medina? It’s a clash of delusional religious belief systems (all religion is delusion). When one faith’s fantasy is that “My god is the ONLY god, so YOUR purported god is an offence to all that is holy” then the only righteous thing to do is smite the idolatry. Blowing up the Kaaba and the city where Mohammed got his start would be SO pleasing to the bloodthirsty spirit that’s at the heart of the Old Testament. Jews AND Christians would LOVE this. When the nuclear warheads explode and Allah does not stop them, that would PROVE Islam is false, in the eyes of the other two monotheistic mental illnesses. Bonus giggles for Jews when they can blast Rome and the Christian deity doesn’t stop the missiles in the sky. “We showed YOU that your Jesus is a myth.”

    You think Israel wouldn’t destroy Cairo and Beirut and Damascus and Amman and Riyadh — I could go on listing large cities in Muslim countries, but it’s getting tedious. The purpose of revenge is to hurt people. Instantly killing a hundred million of the opponents you hate is as hurtful as it gets. No reason for Israel to hold back. When hordes of screaming Muslims are using guns and blades to exterminate every living person in the small space that Israel occupies — you’re enough of a student of history to know about the massacres during the Crusades — those nukes cooked up in Dimona won’t be any use to the dying Jews. Got 400 warheads? Pop ‘em all off!

    I am not as sanguine as you about the U.S.’s potential to avoid fireballs, either. Israeli submarines with missiles could make graveyards of at least a dozen American towns. The protective power of anti-ballistic missile defences is as mythological as “god” is, so they’re not going to stop everything that Israel fires. There will be no new North American homeland for the tribes of Judah. If anyone from Israel escapes the death-crazed Muslims, they’ll be pogrommed wherever they land. “You are part of the religion that destroyed the entire pattern of world civilisation — take THIS, you fucking Hebe!” Netanyahu won’t hold back just because millions of Jews live in New York and elsewhere in the U.S. His Samson Option will follow the same logic that a mass shooter does when he kills his own children in a free-fire family frenzy. “If I can’t control your life, I will give you death.”

    That’ll show the world that they should have stood with Netanyahu so he could do whatever he wanted to. Even in the cities that aren’t instantly fireballed — I don’t suppose Israel has enough excess oomph to take out Mexico City and Hanoi and lots of lesser-detested targets — there will be mass death when the systems that support EVERYTHING that is civilised suddenly stop working. If even a billion human beings are alive in “Year Zero AD” existence after Israel’s last spasm of violence, I’d be surprised. But Netanyahu would be pleased (except he’ll be nothing but a black spot of charred bone fragments.) “You few who are among the living will remember my name forever, and you will never forget the might of the Hebrew religion! Vengeance is mine, sayeth the Lord.” Or sayeth the Devil. Same thing, when you get right down to it.

    I don’t want to seem like I’m just picking on the Jews here. You think the U.S. doesn’t have last-ditch war plans to take everyone else in the world down with Yankee Doodle if things don’t go so dandy? That “Political Science” song by Randy Newman won’t seem so funny when it becomes real. Putin has said that a world without Russia would not be worth living in, hence the “Dead Hand” system to take the rest of humanity down. Perhaps the Brits, French and Chinese would not be as world-wasting if they were about to be dealt a final defeat, but I can’t be sure. India and Pakistan don’t have enough nukes to incinerate all of humanity, but they’d definitely kill the hell out of each other on their way down.

    It’s capital-M Man that’s the problem; furious and fearful mankind. Absolute power corrupts absolutely, and the notion that “I can kill EVERYONE” is the most absolute power of all. The ability to dispense death makes a man like unto a god. Netanyahu is the raging messianic maggot of the moment, but if the world somehow skates through this crisis, there will be others. Humanity as currently constituted is an evolutionary dead end. Our species has been given given a gigantic Darwin Test but we’re not fit to survive. Samson’s suicidal spirit would be smiling, though (if the notion of “souls” was anything more than rank bullshit…)

    Reply

Leave a Comment