Symbolism of the Crimean Bridge Terrorist Attack

Saturday’s car bombing attack that damaged the Crimean Bridge and left three people dead did serve some military purpose, but that’s not the true motivation behind it.

Since the Crimean Bridge first opened to traffic in 2018, every nazi and liberal (ah, I repeat myself) in the western world has been obsessed with destroying it. To understand the bridge bombing, it is crucial to understand the pure rage that provoked it. This rage somewhat literally boils down to the old mantra “build bridges not walls.”

The fall of the Soviet Union marked the birth of the New World Order, that was three decades ago, not really “new” anymore, so let’s just call it the World Order. It’s fascinating how in recent months, our elites including Joe Biden, Antony Blinken, Liz Truss, and mainstream journalists are comfortable with openly discussing the world order, and how they are willing to kill any number of people necessary to defend it. In 1992, the USA brazenly implemented Wolfowitz Doctrine, which calls for using all available punitive measures, up to and including preemptive wars, to prevent any other superpower from emerging. Our future as a species was perfectly planned out. Global elites would control all of the world’s wealth, and the rest of humanity would be kept in perpetual, endless poverty. These lesser humans would be only allowed to exist as a limitless supply of cheap labor, sex slaves, and child pornography for a handful of elites in Western Europe, the USA, and Israel.

But Wolfowitz Doctrine failed two other superpowers emerged, China and Russia. That’s why I say it all boils down to “build bridges not walls.” While our pedophile billionaire elites fully embrace open borders that are methodically destroying communities across the USA, they demand the opposite policy for everywhere else. Everywhere “not USA” or at least not controlled by the USA must be broken down and dismembered into fragmented ethno-states locked in perpetual warfare with each other, like Azerbajan and Armenia, or Kiev and Donbass. Smaller states consolidating into peaceful larger states is an existential threat to the World Order that must be stopped at all costs. That’s why the Crimean Bridge is so triggering to the World Order. Globalists are fine with razor wire and minefields like in Donbass, but there is nothing more enraging than a literal bridge.

There’s a related second reason why the Crimean Bridge is so triggering. It’s the largest bridge in Europe, and truly a marvelous work of engineering. The globalist regimes in the West are so mired in corruption they’re not even capable of a project like that anymore. Every large scale American infrastructure project in recent years has failed miserably (Anyone remember that trillion dollar infrastructure bill Biden pushed through? What happened to the money?). Our oligarchs poured trillions of dollars into Afghanistan and Iraq, but really were just pouring that money straight into their own pockets and nothing of much value was ever built. This failure is particularly obvious in Afghanistan. Inordinately expensive American soccer fields were immediately stripped bare (nobody asked the locals if they actually wanted soccer fields, and they preferred breaking down the structures to bolster their own living quarters). These useless broken down million dollar soccer fields rot in the shadow of massive Soviet-era infrastructure, which still exists and works to this day.

Now, about the attack itself, which was caught on surveillance video. A cargo truck heading from the mainland toward Crimea detonated, killing the driver and two occupants of a passing car (who were unluckily trying to pass the truck at the very moment of detonation). The initial blast caused secondary explosions from the fuel cars of a passing freight train.

There’s not a lot of information to go off of yet, though there has been some speculation about the driver (see this article from RT). This is by definition a suicide bombing – and remember that a suicide bombing can happen without the consent of the person, or even his knowledge. It is arguably better for the driver to not know, because this eliminates the risks of him getting cold feet, or acting suspiciously enough to be arrested or stopped before he can perform the deed. this also eliminates the hassle of trying to recruit someone crazy enough to want to kill himself for the cause. The perfect timing required to also hit the fuel cars suggests that the bomb was remote-detonated. However, there are still questions in my mind.

First, the idea of a remote-detonated bomb seems to almost require some form of real-time surveillance, aside from maybe a NATO satellite, most methods, like an observer or a drone, would carry some sort of risk. It’s possible someone was even watching surveillance feeds from the entrance ramp – these cameras are often, from what I’ve been told by credible people, not particularly difficult to access. Maybe, just maybe, surveillance wasn’t even necessary. For example, a customer could tell the driver his delivery is urgently time-sensitive and he needs to report in when he reaches the bridge. A big bridge is a logical milestone for a status report and wouldn’t seem suspicious, though adds the risk of the driver forgetting or not caring enough to call. Even with the question of surveillance solved, there’s the remaining matter of how to coax the driver to time his entry onto the bridge perfectly to match the train. It’s such a wild variable that would make the plan more complicated than it needed to be and might have just been total coincidence.

Regardless of details, this bombing required intentionally killing at least one person. It’s not even collateral damage, it’s deliberate damage. It’s a terrorist tactic no different than ISIS. Needless to say, every single western news report that I have seen describes the attack in abstracts. Even surface-level explanation that this attack required a suicide bombing would make it seem less “heroic.” It’s not heroic to literally use someone has a human torpedo, especially against his will.

Anyway, consider CNN reporting of the bridge attack before, and after, the Russian retaliatory strikes against Ukraine:

Before: Crimea Bridge Explosion Worsens Putin’s Nightmare in Ukraine

While Kyiv has not claimed responsibility for the Kerch Strait bridge blast, it has previously taken credit for a series of strikes on targets in Russian-occupied Crimea over the summer...

Ukraine has been targeting this system with slow, patient accuracy. First Izium, which led to the collapse around Kharkiv. Then Lyman, which is leading to the erosion of Russia’s control of Donetsk and Luhansk. And now the Kerch Bridge, which had become so vital to everything that Russia is trying to hold on to in the south...

Ukraine has had patient timing on hitting these pressure points. They have not struck until they have seen a moment of weakness – until the Russians are experiencing serious issues already – ensuring that the damage inflicted lasts while time-consuming repairs are underway. (While Russia claims that railway traffic was set to be restored by Saturday night, the bridge’s vulnerability to attack at the least will lessen traffic)...

There is a sizeable risk of this. The Kerch bridge can be hit again. The railway link across Melitopol is now a target of outsized value. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said just last week that an offensive from Zaporizhzhia towards Melitopol was a possibility. The mere possibility that Russia’s last untouched railway path into the south could be disrupted raises existential issues for its occupation.

Kyiv’s smart and patient strikes on Russia’s ageing transport dependencies has left Putin with a series of existential decisions to make in the hours ahead. He’s made a lot of bad ones in the past seven months. Does the Kerch explosion add to that list, or provide a cold bath of reality, and a readjustment of the Kremlin’s view of the possible.

So, in no uncertain terms, CNN openly credited Ukraine with the terrorist attack and praised their tactical and strategic ingenuity behind it. Then the Russian missile attacks came today. A lot of them. Suddenly, CNN felt Ukraine wasn’t responsible for the attack anymore.

Ukraine has not claimed responsibility for the Crimea bridge blast, but Russian President Vladimir Putin has accused Ukrainian “special services” of the attack.

Russia hitting Ukrainian infrastructure with a barrage of missiles isn’t something to be joyful about, far from it. Ultimately, Russia had to respond to such an act of terrorism or they would have looked weak. And this is, in general terms, a pretty clear rebuttal of endless NATO propaganda that Russia has “run out” of smart munitions. Oh and by the way, look at CNN’s hysterical coverage of Russia’s missile strikes, like it’s the worse thing that ever happened and probably ten billion times worse than the Holocaust, and compare to how they talked about Bush’s “shock and awe” in Iraq.

But really, there’s a bigger problem. The Crimean Bridge bombing wasn’t planned in Kiev. When that truck blew up on Saturday, the people responsible for it were attending Synagogue in Washington DC.

Ian Kummer

I now have a new YouTube channel that I will use to upload videos from my travels around Russia. Expect new content there soon. Please give me a follow here.

Also feel free to connect with me on Quora (I sometimes share unique articles there).

---