Yesterday Ukraine and Russia conducted their second body exchange of the year, and the numbers were not pretty. 1,000 Ukrainian soldiers for 35 Russians (the previous exchange was 1,000 for 38). Note that the reason for there always being 1,000 Ukrainians traded is that Kiev put a cap on the number of bodies they would receive at once to avoid public embarrassment. It is not impossible they also do this to avoid bankruptcy from paying out too many death benefits at once, though rumor has it that families are forced to waive the right to death benefits before they can receive the remains. Otherwise, the soldier remains on the “missing in action” or “AWOL” lists and his remains in a freezer.
So we can assume that there are thousands upon thousands of fallen Ukrainians piling up in Russian morgues while their government is actively disinterested in their repatriation for political and PR reasons.
The usual cope for such lopsided body exchanges is that Russia is advancing and Ukraine is retreating, therefore not retrieving Russian bodies. Well, what can that mean? Do none of the Russian attacks fail? Are Ukrainians not conducting successful counterattacks (thereby killing the enemies who occupied those positions)? Or are Ukrainian units just wiped out so quickly there is literally no one left alive to be worried about sanitizing the area?
As I noted in yesterday’s post, Russian advances are the slowest “since WWI.” We’re talking less than 100 meters a day in some places. How could Ukrainian troops possibly not be able to clean up the bodies unless they just can’t because they’re dead?
Ukrainian units being completely wiped out by artillery and air strikes would be more consistent with this than merely taking casualties. If even a few soldiers survived, they would want to clear away both friendly and enemy dead for their own health. The fact that they don’t suggests that many Russian strikes simply leave no survivors to clean up the dead until that area changes hands.
It is true that not every Russian casualty was at the frontline, but the same can be said for the Ukrainians, and it is admitted that Russia has a massive firepower advantage and exponentially greater deepstrike capabilities. So these are thousands of Ukrainian dead in addition to whoever is killed in the rear echelons.
We cannot know the full extent of the Ukrainian death toll until after the war, maybe years after the war, but when it is known, what will the western public reaction be? Will they even care? I suspect not.
Ian Kummer
I now have a new YouTube channel that I will use to upload videos from my travels around Russia. Expect new content there soon. Please give me a follow here.
Also feel free to connect with me on Quora (I sometimes share unique articles there).

hello everybody
Ah yes. The numbers.I recently read there is a better than 0.8 correlation between such exchanges of bodies and the casualty figures.The ca. 1000:35 ratio has been holding up for all the exchanges since the beginning of 2025; more than 20,000 Ukrainians by now. And the Russians have said they have thousands more in coolers.These ratios very likely mirror the actual casualties.Russian tactics seem to rely on blowing up enemy strongholds, use of 10× the fire power, caution, no qualms about tactical retreats, strikes in the rear and on logistics trains, and Solntsepyok for those you can't smoke out or discover. Ukrainian tactics seem to dictate holding your ground regardless the cost and surges to score PR points with the Western sponsors.Of course there is always the cope of the 3:1 ratio offense to defense, but this does not imply casualty proportions. Many of the statistics are based on these time-tested rules of thumb (like 4 injured for each KiA), except that none of these rules are actually time-tested. Even if they were, what about advances in front-line treatment, helicopter evacuations, battle-front medicine, anti-biotics, pain-killers, etc.? What about advances in lethal weapon systems? We really don't know.The casualty numbers for all past wars were subject to the same coping and propaganda as today.For many past wars the numbers were never settled scholarship, and the guestimates often relied on the same rules of thumb that were formulated to compensate for reliable numbers, so there are no reliable records.Just think. 90% of the rape accusations and convictions of American soldiers in WW2 just happened to be black. Hmmm.
Webej, The numbers in the body exchanges are reliable, since the Red Cross is present to monitor.